Saltar al contenido principal
Infectious Disease

High-speed trains versus air transport vectors for mass transfers of critically ill patients: The TRANSCOV cohort study

BACKGROUND: The first COVID-19 epidemic wave hit the East and Ile-de-France regions in France, resulting in overwhelmed intensive care units (ICUs). Alongside helicopters and planes, high-speed trains were used for the first time to mass-evacuate critically ill patients. This stu

EC
EuroClinics Editorial 18 May 2026
2 min read 360 words
High-speed trains versus air transport vectors for mass transfers of critically ill patients: The TRANSCOV cohort study
BACKGROUND: The first COVID-19 epidemic wave hit the East and Ile-de-France regions in France, resulting in overwhelmed intensive care units (ICUs). Alongside helicopters and planes, high-speed trains were used for the first time to mass-evacuate critically ill patients. This study aimed to compare outcomes of patients evacuated by trains and by aircrafts. METHODS: This was a multicentre retrospective cohort study. Between 13 March and 10 April 2020, 38 ICUs in France transferred patients with severe COVID-19 to 60 ICUs in unaffected regions and countries. Patients were divided into the train group (n = 130) and the air group (n = 163). The study outcomes included 28-day case-fatality, destination ICU length of stay and post-transfer Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. RESULTS: Age and comorbidity did not differ between groups. Although patients spent more time (+2 hours) and travelled further (+250 km) in the train group than in the air group, the median post-transfer SOFA score was lower in the train group (6 vs 7; p = 0.03). The 28-day mortality rates were not different (train/air unadjusted incidence risk ratio: 0.96; p = 0.94). The ICU stay duration was shorter (-6 days) in the train group, but this difference was reduced after adjusting for clinical events, such as nosocomial infections. CONCLUSION: High-speed train was a safe vehicle for remote transfer of critically ill patients. The selection of healthier patients and the better physiological and care conditions during the evacuation may explain the shorter ICU stays of patients transferred by trains.

Auteur(s) : Thipayamaskomon Chatpimuk, Grimaud Olivier, Tattevin Pierre, Lamhaut Lionel, Leray Emmanuelle, Letellier Noemie, Bayat Sahar, Fermanian Christophe, Martin Sylvie, Philippe Jean-Marc, Maury Eric, Noizet Marc, Braun François, Dolz Manuel, Sanchez Marc-Antoine, Coignard-Biehler Hélène, Prieto Nathalie, Delamare Hugues, Cayré Virginie, Carli Pierre, Vuagnat Albert, Pottecher Julien, Ricard-Hibon Agnès

Année de publication : 2026

Pages : e0348090

Site web de l'éditeur

En relation avec

Nos dernières actualités

actualité

21 mai 2026

10 ans d'engagement et d'action au service de la santé publique

actualité

6 mai 2026

Appel à candidatures pour le renouvellement du comité de rédaction du...

actualité

28 avril 2026

Lancement du réseau « chaleur-santé-bâti-urbanisme » : vers des villes et...

EC

EuroClinics Editorial

Patient-facing healthcare guidance

Our editorial team distils the latest from European medical authorities (WHO Europe, ECDC, EMA, NHS, AEMPS, HAS) into plain-language guides for patients. Every article is reviewed against authoritative sources.

🏥

Need infectious disease in Europe?

Browse verified clinics with transparent pricing and real reviews across 30+ countries.

Find a clinic →
Source. Santé publique France — Santé publique France, sous licence ouverte 2.0
Medical disclaimer. Articles are general information aggregated from third-party medical sources. They are NOT a substitute for in-person diagnosis or treatment. For personal medical guidance, consult a verified clinician or call your local emergency line (112 in the EU).